American real wages have been contracting for five months, since the month inflation overtook wage growth, and Gregory Daco says that is the constraint the market is not looking at.
The unemployment rate is 4.1%, which he agrees is a good number. He is still arguing against the rate hike the market is pricing for next week.
"So it's a solid number. I think there's no escaping the fact that a low 4% unemployment rate is very encouraging. Many people that want a job have a job."
Daco is the economist EY-Parthenon's clients plan their year against, and he came on to say exactly what the August CPI print has to show for the Fed to move — a single number, and the level above which he thinks a hike follows.
I listened to the full segment so you can skip it.
Here are the 4 takeaways that matter.
👤 Guest: Gregory Daco, Chief Economist at EY-Parthenon, who publishes the US outlook the firm's clients plan against
🎙️ Host: Melissa Lee, who anchors CNBC's Fast Money
📰 Published: 9 September 2026 on CNBC
🔴 CNBC | ⏱️ 4 min
Key Takeaways
0.2% month-over-month core inflation is the line, and above it Daco expects a September hike
He calls it a key anchor for Fed policymakers rather than a forecast of his own
The bigger risk is further out, when higher energy prices feed through into core inflation
Consumer spending has been financed by stock market gains, so a flat market moves the burden onto income
Real wages have been contracting for five months, since inflation crossed above wage growth
Two years of negative supply shocks turned what could have been a 3%-plus economy into a 2% one
Daco is cautious on a hike because it hits interest-rate-sensitive sectors without touching the causes of the inflation
1. The 0.2% Trigger
Melissa Lee brought Daco in on what to expect from the inflation reads and how they feed into the Fed meeting the following week. He split his answer into the near term and the part he thinks matters more.
The near-term number is a threshold, not a forecast: "I think at the next release, when it comes to the CPI data, we're going to see core inflation rise about 0.2% month over month," he said. "I mentioned 0.2% because that's a key anchor for Fed policymakers. Anything above that will likely trigger a rate hike at the September meeting."
The part he flagged as more important is the path after it: "We're going to see higher energy prices feed into core inflation, and that's a real risk for the U.S. economy"
His reason for calling it a risk rather than an inconvenience is the composition of growth — a few pillars are resilient, but the underlying driver, consumer spending, is exposed
2. Wealth, Not Wages
The exposure Daco described is not about how much people earn but about what has been paying for their spending.
"Consumer spending has been financed to a great degree by wealth accumulation coming from very strong stock market earnings," he said
The scenario he is watching does not require a sell-off, only a stall: "If you take that out, and if you have a flat stock market environment and you're increasingly relying on income, that's where the rubber hits the road."
Income is the part that is already going backwards: "Because we're currently in an environment where real wage growth is actually contracting, real wages have been contracting for the last five months, and that's a key constraint for many households."
3. Shocks on Top of Shocks
Lee asked how this differs from the other stretches since the Iran war began when oil prices were at these levels and fed through. Daco's answer was that nothing about this shock is happening on a clean slate.
"It's the accumulation of shocks, which is really an issue," he said. "What we've had over the past two years, arguably, is a series of negative supply shocks that have been hurting consumers, hurting businesses, because the cost of living, the cost of doing business has continuously increased."
On the specific channel the desk had just been debating: "The cost of capital is much greater than it was just a year ago." He said input and goods costs are much higher for many businesses too
The counterfactual is what he takes to clients: "I often talk to clients about the economy. That could have been we could have been right now talking about a U.S. economy growing at a 3% plus. Instead, we're talking about a 2% economy, and that is in line with its potential."
His view is that the missing growth was available: "It could have grown much faster thanks to the AI boom that we're currently seeing. Unfortunately, we're in this negative supply shock environment"
4. What 4.1% Hides
A trader on the desk put the last question, opening with the NFL season starting that night and Bill Parcells's line that you are what your record says you are — then asked whether 4.1% unemployment is as good as it looks or whether something below the surface worries him.
Daco took the number at face value first: "So it's a solid number. I think there's no escaping the fact that a low 4% unemployment rate is very encouraging. Many people that want a job have a job."
His counter-question was about the crossover rather than the level: "If you have an environment where wage growth is decelerating while inflation is accelerating. At one point they crossed over and that point happened five months ago." That is the arithmetic behind the contracting real wages, and he said it is what households actually spend out of at the end of the month
On the policy conclusion, he was explicit that he does not want the hike his own threshold implies: "And that's why I am very cautious about the Fed potentially raising rates in this environment, because it's likely to impact interest rate sensitive sectors disproportionately without necessarily affecting the underlying causes of inflation being above the 2% target."
His list of what a rate rise does not reach: "You're not addressing the Middle East conflict. You're not addressing tariffs." The segment ended before he finished the third item
Bonus Insights
Daco never gave a house call on whether the Fed will hike — he gave the number that would settle it, which puts the decision on Friday's data rather than on his forecast
He described the labor market and the wage picture as two different questions, and said the encouraging one is the one everybody quotes
The AI boom appears in his account as forgone growth rather than as a bubble: the capital spending is real, and the supply shocks are what stop it showing up in the growth rate
Daco's bottom line is that the Fed is being pushed toward a rate rise by an inflation problem it cannot reach with rates, into an economy where the consumer has already lost five months of real wage growth and is leaning on a stock market that only has to go flat to expose it.
If this was worth your time, send it to someone who has to have a view on this.
Get the latest market chatter as it happens: