Decoder Sep 21, 2026 58m 32m saved
With Mark Gurman, Chief Apple Correspondent and Managing Editor of Consumer Technology at Bloomberg
Apple held a product launch event in September 2026, the first run by a new chief executive, and shipped no new artificial-intelligence feature with it.
The company spent billions buying and repairing Intel's modem business rather than depend on Qualcomm. On AI, its executives have said publicly that Apple never owned search and does not need to own AI. Mark Gurman thinks those two positions cannot both be held.
"So you're willing to do that, to own something like a modem, but you're not willing to own AI. It's ridiculous."
Gurman has not been inside an Apple event since 2019, and reports the company's product roadmap anyway. Host Nilay Patel credits him with breaking the news that Tim Cook was looking for a successor, and with being among the first to report that it would be John Ternus.
The full interview is covered here so you can skip it. 58 minutes of audio, 26 minutes of reading.
Here are the 15 insights that matter.
Key Takeaways
Apple ran a September 2026 keynote with no new AI feature in it — the first 15 minutes replayed what Apple Intelligence already did
About half a dozen AI-native devices are coming in the next year and a half, starting with a smart home hub built like an Amazon Echo Show A home security system, a hub on a robotic arm, smart glasses and camera-equipped AirPods are the rest
Johny Srouji is the second most important person at Apple and is already looking to leave again, having told Cook last year he was done Gurman says there is no internal successor with the standing to run hardware as one group
Apple has shown no sign of restarting its own frontier-model work — no acquisitions, no poaching packages, no in-house build
Tim Cook's team was retired one post at a time from 2023, CFO, then COO, then general counsel, then Cook himself Gurman calls the pattern Hotel California: almost none of them actually left the building
Phil Schiller stepped off the App Store as Eddy Cue looks for more developer revenue, through extra advertising slots and subscriptions
Apple's second-biggest problem after AI is retention, because vice presidents leave when the senior VPs above them never do
The Apple Watch's always-on listening feature is a surveillance device, and Gurman says Apple should have waited a year and launched it with the glasses
Foldables become the normal phone within a decade — smartphones went from about 6% of the market at the end of 2006 to about 85%
The car, not the Vision Pro, was the multi-trillion-dollar miss of Cook's tenure
1. A Cook Event, New Face
Patel opened by asking whether Gurman ever misses not knowing what is about to be announced. Gurman said he does not think about it that way: he is a lifelong Apple fan who is unusually lucky to cover a company whose products he actually uses, and the job is to deliver the news to people who want it down to the last minute.
On the keynote itself, his first read was that the change at the top barely registered.
Ternus's first keynote was indistinguishable from a Tim Cook keynote
I have to say, this event really didn't feel much different than a Tim Cook event. They felt pretty interchangeable.
Mark Gurman
The exception was the opening. Ternus led with a point of view on AI, the "intelligent personal hub", and Gurman said that is a management difference rather than a presentation one. Cook, he said, answers an executive's proposal with more questions and rarely makes a single call on his own, preferring communal decision-making. Ternus decides.
Ternus gives an answer where Cook gives more questions
John Ternus, if you come to him and you want him to make a decision, he'll make a decision. He'll have an opinion.
Mark Gurman
Gurman was explicit that he may disagree with the opinion, and that plenty of people will think the OpenAI or Anthropic approach is better. His point was that after two years of Apple Intelligence without a clear narrative, Apple finally had one.
2. No New AI At An AI Event
Patel's own read of the event was that Apple was playing its greatest hits to make sure its new chief executive could not fail: the intelligent personal hub is the iMac-as-digital-hub story again, and "there's one more thing" closed the show. He compared it to a band hiring a new lead singer and starting him on the songs everyone knows.
Gurman agreed on the substance and named the gap.
A September 2026 Apple event shipped no notable new AI feature
Apple held a major product launch event in September of the year 2026 and did not introduce a single notable new AI feature.
Mark Gurman
The opening stretch was a re-telling of the past two years
The first 15 minutes or so of the keynote was simply a replay, a re-narrativization of what they introduced over the past two years with Apple Intelligence.
Mark Gurman
His explanation is that Apple has no AI device at its core, so it has to present the iPhone as the AI device until it has something better. He said that framing will change the moment a genuine AI product arrives, and was careful not to frame it as a criticism — a company touts what it has.
Nothing on the stage was a risk
No major new AI product, no smart home hub, nothing in the spatial space, just straight down the middle.
Mark Gurman
Patel's counter was that the AI a user notices is happening in cloud services. Meta launched Muse the same week, and he said Zuckerberg is handing people 8GB of storage and 8GB of RAM in the cloud to run things an iPhone cannot.
3. Six AI Devices Coming
Asked what comes next, Gurman gave a roadmap rather than a rumor.
Roughly six AI-native devices arrive within 18 months
There are about a half dozen AI-native devices coming in the next year and a half or so.
Mark Gurman
The first is a smart display with its own operating system
The first will be the smart home hub, which is basically an Amazon Echo Show but Apple-style.
Mark Gurman
He described a square screen, an entirely new operating system built around the question of what a Siri AI operating system would look like, intercom and video conferencing, and proactive intelligence — it recognizes who walked up to it using AI-based Face ID and shows content personal to that person, and it knows who is speaking.
The rest of the list:
A home security system
A second version of the smart home hub mounted on a robotic arm, so it sits on a desk and moves — a category he says is popular in Asia and China right now
Smart glasses, which he still expects to be introduced and shipped in 2027
AirPods with cameras
A few other wearables he would not name
He put a date on the glasses and staked himself to it
Trust me, you'll be wearing them. Within 365 days, you will be wearing them and have video footage of you wearing them at the Steve Jobs Theater.
Mark Gurman
4. From Jobs' Apple To IBM
Patel laid out the eras: Jobs defined the company through devices and through standing on stage explaining why every existing smartphone was bad; Cook's version is about scale, values and above all privacy, including the fight with the FBI over iPhone encryption. His claim was that the Vision Pro never had the cultural weight of even the hockey-puck mouse.
Gurman pushed back on the premise, not the conclusion. Every time he publishes anything about the Vision Pro being on life support, he said, he gets messages from dozens of people that amount to a notch or two below a death threat. He attributes the anger to two groups: developers who built businesses around spatial computing and can see the category dying, and consumers who spent four grand on the headset.
On what the relationship to the company has become, he gave a two-word answer.
Apple in the Cook era is an institution, not a product company
It's IBM.
Mark Gurman
5. Why Cook Left Before Duo
The timing is the part Gurman finds most revealing. Cook could have introduced the iPhone Duo himself and then stepped down.
The best Apple product in two decades landed a week after Cook left
You've got the coolest new iPhone and Apple product in maybe 10, 20 years introduced one week after Tim Cook steps down.
Mark Gurman
Apple transitions normally happen in mid-October, mid-April or on January 1. This one did not.
Handing the Duo to Ternus was a choice, not a coincidence
It was a specific decision that was made for John Ternus to be the one to introduce the iPhone Duo.
Mark Gurman
He noted that the hardware Ternus is now announcing was in development for five to 10 years under Cook, and that over the next 12 to 18 months Apple has six or seven new product categories and perhaps 25 breakthrough items to show. Cook's own product record he summed up as the Apple Watch, which started as a dud and became a success; the AirPods, an accessory that is not yet a platform; and the Vision Pro, which he called a failure. The reading Gurman gives is that if Cook was going to leave within three years anyway, Apple decided Ternus should get the credit for all of it.
6. The Hotel California Plan
Gurman dated the succession work to 2023, when Cook began opening every executive-level meeting by saying Apple needed to take succession seriously. The trigger was demographic and financial at once: many of the people at the top either had half a billion dollars in the bank or were already billionaires, and the whole cohort was going to age out at the same time.
The sequence he described:
End of 2024 — CFO Luca Maestri retires, replaced by Kevan Parekh
2025 — COO Jeff Williams retires, replaced by his deputy Sabih Khan
2026 — general counsel Kate Adams is replaced by Jennifer Newstead, hired from Meta
End of 2026 — Cook hands the chief executive job to Ternus
What interests Gurman is that almost nobody actually left. He calls the strategy Hotel California. Cook stays as executive chairman. Adams stayed an extra six to nine months to run government affairs. Williams stayed three to four months after stepping down as COO to oversee design, the watch and health as part of the handover. Maestri gave the bulk of the CFO job to his successor but kept information systems and technology, corporate information security and corporate real estate — campuses, retail stores and facilities.
The retained CFO role was a retainer, not a job
It was kind of a BS job, I'll be honest with you.
Mark Gurman
Its real purpose, he said, was keeping Maestri on the payroll in case a financial problem needed the grandfather in the room during the transition. Maestri is still there and now teaches a class once a week at Apple University.
Phil Schiller is the most recent. The same week Ternus took over, Gurman reported that Schiller was giving up his remaining responsibilities, the App Store and Apple Events, and moving to unspecified special projects, still reporting to Ternus and still on the Apple leadership page.
This is the largest executive turnover Gurman has covered
It's the biggest executive overhaul I've certainly seen in my career reporting on Apple.
Mark Gurman
He contrasted it with 2011: when Cook took over from Jobs there was no overhaul at all, and most of the people under Cook were the same people who had been under Jobs. He expects another wave, because the heads of marketing and retail and several others are approaching their mid-60s, have hundreds of millions of dollars, and are discussing retirement internally.
7. Schiller And The App Store
Patel raised Gurman's reporting that Schiller's exit from the App Store is connected to Ternus and Eddy Cue wanting to pull more money out of developers, which Schiller has long thought Apple squeezes too hard.
Gurman gave several reasons at once. Schiller is 66 and wants more time with his family and more philanthropy. Separately, Cue now has a firm grip over all Apple services for the first time in a while, Ternus is close to Cue, and the two are looking at new ways to make money on the App Store — additional advertising slots and additional subscription opportunities, plus a reinvention of the store itself over the next few years to use AI and feed into Siri AI.
And Schiller, by Gurman's reporting, does not think the pressure is over: he believes regulators are still on Apple's trail and developers are still unhappy, so he wants some distance from the next phase. Gurman was clear there was no blow-up between Schiller, Cue and Ternus, and that Schiller remains at Apple for the foreseeable future.
Patel added that Schiller is right about the regulators — the Department of Justice antitrust case over the App Store and CarPlay was started under the Biden administration and has not gone away under Trump.
Gurman expected the antitrust case to be dropped and it was not
First of all, it's surprising that it hasn't gone away under the Trump administration, given the alliance between Donald Trump and Tim Cook.
Mark Gurman
He added that nobody knows the state of that fight better than Schiller, who sits at the center of every meeting, does the depositions and takes the stand.
8. Retention As A Problem
Patel's standing argument on Decoder is that a company's structure and its culture are the same question.
Structure predicts where a company's problems are
If you tell me how your company is roughly organized, I can tell you where about 80 percent of your problems are and where the other 20 percent of the magic is.
Nilay Patel
Applied to Apple, he said the structure barely changed for decades while the same cast of people stayed in place, so the culture persisted by default. Now the top has turned over wholesale, and the layer below it is moving too: there is no chief design officer any more, and the design leads listed on the leadership page are vice presidents rather than senior vice presidents reporting to Ternus, after Alan Dye left for Meta.
Gurman's concern is what that does to people one tier down. Vice presidents who want to grow are sitting under senior vice presidents who are never going to move. Eddy Cue has been at Apple for almost four decades, and people under Cue have already left for bigger jobs elsewhere because they could see that the seat above them was not opening.
Retention is Apple's second problem after AI
I think one of their biggest problems, other than AI at this point, is retention of key players.
Mark Gurman
His guess at the fix is another layer of titles. Apple has run VPs, senior VPs and executive VPs before, and he can imagine Craig Federighi being made something like chief software and AI officer so that people below him can be promoted to senior vice president with more responsibility and more money.
Patel tied the two threads together, and Gurman agreed it was a good point.
Thin junior ranks are why Apple did not see AI coming
Not having that bench of younger people with new ideas or disruptive ideas, I think, prevented them from seeing AI for what it was.
Nilay Patel
9. Srouji's Next Move
Gurman asked to talk about Johny Srouji, who now holds the chief hardware officer title — a title Apple has never had before.
Srouji ranks second inside Apple, on the strength of Apple Silicon
Right now, Srouji is the second most important person at Apple.
Mark Gurman
Apple Silicon is the company's differentiator and its competitive advantage, and losing the person who created it would have been, in Gurman's account, a nightmare. Late last summer or early last fall, as planning for the Ternus handover was accelerating, Srouji went to Cook and said he was done. Cook asked him to stay through the transition, told him Apple could not have him going to Nvidia or anywhere else, and offered him the chief hardware officer role: his existing team plus everything Ternus had been running, and unambiguous second place in the company. Srouji took it, and Gurman assumes a new pay package came with it.
He does not think it holds.
Gurman expects Srouji to be trying to leave again already
I think that he's already back to wanting to transition to something new, to transition out of Apple.
Mark Gurman
The reason is that the hardware problems are finished
He conquered the Mac; he dumped Intel; he dumped Qualcomm. What's left?
Mark Gurman
Gurman put the timeline at a year or two, and said the consequence is structural: the hardware engineering teams have just been recombined into one group under Srouji, and Apple will have to break them apart again because "there's no successor to Srouji who has that industry clout and that leadership capability to be a singular hardware figurehead at the company."
On the modem, both of them conceded the result. Patel said Apple's own modems are shipping in the new phones, though Apple also had to slow down the Qualcomm modems to make its own look competitive. Gurman said he would have bet two years ago that it would be a disaster, and that there are no articles about dropped calls or pages failing to load.
10. Modems Yes, Models No
The Cook Doctrine, as Patel described it, is that Apple wants to own and control every foundational technology in its phones — a reaction to years of dependence on Intel. AI broke it: the investment was enormous, Apple had just spent heavily on a car that never shipped, it has no frontier model of its own, and it ended up distilling Google's model instead.
Gurman's objection is to the argument Apple executives have made in public.
"We never owned search" is not a defense for not owning AI
It's one of the craziest things that I've ever heard — Craig and these other executives in these interviews over the last year saying that, "We never owned search. We don't need to own AI."
Mark Gurman
Apple spent billions to own a commodity part and will not spend to own AI
So you're willing to do that, to own something like a modem, but you're not willing to own AI. It's ridiculous.
Mark Gurman
By his account Apple did try to build its own models from the ground up and could not.
The Google partnership was forced
They ran into a wall, and they had no choice but to partner with Google on fixing up their models.
Mark Gurman
Internally the position has always been that Google is a stopgap until Apple can build its own. Gurman says nothing he can see supports that.
There is no visible work on the in-house plan
I've seen absolutely zero evidence that they're actually working on that plan A again.
Mark Gurman
He listed what is missing: no evidence of building fresh Apple-made models, no evidence of large AI acquisitions, no evidence of big pay packages aimed at researchers at Meta, Google, Anthropic or OpenAI. His read is that Apple is waiting — to see how the Google deal and the third-party arrangements go over the next several months, to see the Anthropic and OpenAI IPOs, and to see how the AI-safety news plays out. He thinks a decision could come in about six months.
Patel's joke was that at least there is no chance Siri kills us all, because it is not capable enough. Gurman did not take the out.
Apple's AI position was an accident, not a strategy
Apple's current AI product was not the result of good work, right? It was the ultimate failing upwards.
Mark Gurman
11. The OpenAI Puck And Ive
Jony Ive is building products at OpenAI, a number of Apple designers have followed him, and Apple is suing OpenAI over what it says is stolen internal information and product plans. OpenAI's position is that conversations and job interviews are normal business. Patel's framing of the threat is that Ive will make natural language the next general-purpose interface the way multi-touch was, and that Ive himself called the phone and the laptop legacy devices in his launch video with Sam Altman.
Apple makes the best of the devices Ive says are finished
And Apple makes the best legacy devices, and they don't want that to be their final chapter.
Mark Gurman
Gurman described the OpenAI product as a hockey-puck-sized AI computer you talk to, with no display, and said Apple is frightened of it. He also said the fear is unnecessary.
Apple has gone to court to get a look at the device itself
In fact, the latest development in their lawsuit is that Apple wants the court to show them and give them access to the upcoming device so they can analyze if it has any of their materials in it.
Mark Gurman
If it works, Apple copies it quickly
I think the models are getting commoditized to a point where they could fast-follow and have a very effective product.
Mark Gurman
The reason that is available to Apple, he said, is that the model suppliers have nothing to lose by helping. Apple could ask Anthropic to partner on a copy of the OpenAI device, or ask Google for better models, and both would say yes.
Neither partner has a hardware business to protect
Google has no legitimate hardware business that's going to be destroyed over partnering with Apple on hardware. Anthropic has no hardware business.
Mark Gurman
He contrasted this with the smart glasses, where Apple is arriving five or seven years behind everyone else.
On the lawsuit itself, Gurman said OpenAI employees have clearly done some shady things, and that he is surprised OpenAI has not cut ties with the former iPhone engineer at the center of the case. His theory on why is internal: if OpenAI drops an employee the moment Apple sues, nobody else there will feel safe.
Patel noted that none of the filings mention Ive at all, and that neither company wants to name him. Gurman thinks that is deliberate — and that Ive is the real origin of the case.
Apple's grievance is that Ive dismantled its design team from inside
I think Apple's point of view is that Jony Ive was on Apple's payroll for half a decade or more after the Apple Watch. During that time, basically destroyed the Apple design team from within and took everyone with him to build a competitor to the products that he developed at Apple.
Mark Gurman
He gave the other side as well: that every Apple product today descends from Ive's work, including the iPhone Duo.
Ive's view is that he built the company's whole portfolio
I think that he believes that he created the product portfolio that's the basis of this $3 to 4 trillion company.
Mark Gurman
Gurman said Ive was tired after carrying the company following Jobs' death, agreed with Cook to work only a few days a week, and eventually wanted to build something new — and that there is a lot of anger toward him at Apple, particularly from Cook.
Patel's aside is worth keeping: every one of Ive's best products was designed around a limitation, such as the iMac around the depth of a CRT, and AI presents no limitations because it claims it can do everything. He said he is waiting to see what constraint Ive picks.
12. Screens Are Not Optional
Gurman said the screenless idea is both a blessing and a curse, and that it will show how useful AI is when it runs in the background with nothing to look at. Then he named what a device without a display cannot do: gaming, video conferencing and watching video — three large markets each.
A screenless device cannot cover three of the biggest use cases
I just don't know how OpenAI takes over the world with a device that can't video chat, can't do gaming, and can't do video.
Mark Gurman
He added the historical point that being an iPhone companion has never been enough.
13. Cameras In The AirPods
Patel's framing is that AirPods succeed because of their attach rate to the iPhone rather than as a platform. Gurman added that people lose or break them every six months and buy more.
Cameras change the category. The AirPods would carry the visual intelligence feature that already exists on the iPhone: point at something, get information, take action on it, all without the phone in your hand.
The device reads the world and answers with it
So it uses visual information to provide you with context to help you throughout your day.
Mark Gurman
His two examples: telling the AirPods to stop you in the pasta aisle at Whole Foods when they see the tomato sauce you want, and walking directions that say to turn right by the black sedan parked at the corner rather than in 40 feet.
He connected it to the pricing move Apple just made.
Cheap AirPods with good noise cancellation force the Pro model upmarket
you're now getting really solid ANC, even though it's not inner ear, with some Pro features like the volume swipe at about 150 bucks, that's a really good product at a really good price.
Mark Gurman
That, he said, sets up the need for a much better AirPods Pro, and the cameras are the differentiator that does it.
14. The Watch That Listens
Patel set up the privacy problem from experience — he tried Microsoft HoloLens 10 years ago doing augmented-reality demos much like what Gurman describes, and the obstacles were battery life and the social objection to a camera pointed at everyone. He said the killer app for Meta's glasses would be facial recognition, and that it would require a worldwide surveillance database built from people photographing each other all day, which is why he does not want it to exist.
Against that, Apple has shipped watchOS 27 with always-on listening that produces transcripts without storing audio. Double-click and it shows a transcript of the last 15 seconds of what someone said to you, without their permission.
Gurman's verdict on his own beat's company
Still a surveillance device. I'll be honest with you. I can't believe they did it.
Mark Gurman
His advice to the company he covers
First of all, read the room.
Mark Gurman
There was a factual disagreement inside it, which Gurman flagged himself: he has not attended an Apple event since 2019 and had no briefings, but Apple's own website says a microphone icon appears during live rewind. He is less sure about the all-day listening and the Siri Recap. He then pointed at his wrist on camera and asked Patel whether he could see anything on the watch screen.
His objection is sequencing, not principle.
The feature is a net negative because nothing was lost by waiting
I think that doing this feature is a bigger drawback than not doing the feature. Here, there is no cost of not doing something.
Mark Gurman
Patel argued there is a cost: a wave of startups already does always-on transcription and meeting recording, and shipping first forecloses the competition the way Microsoft used to preview features. Gurman's reply was that the wave has not arrived yet, so this could have waited six months.
The reason it shipped is that the watch had nothing else
This is the weakest Apple Watch update we've seen in a long time, and they're lost as to what to do next.
Mark Gurman
His alternative plan would have been to take the whole backlash at once — audio and visual intelligence together next year, with one coherent privacy story. A major watch revamp is coming at the end of next year.
On the AirPods cameras, he laid out what he thinks the defense will be: they cannot record video or take pictures, they run at a few frames per second, and the data is closer to the wireframe view a Roomba app shows than to an image. He said it would not be able to tell him and Patel apart. When Patel asked how it could then read brands of tomato sauce, Gurman said text and color are exactly what it would rely on, and that telling two people apart is the hard case.
On who caused the problem, he was blunt.
Meta made the whole category harder to sell
They soiled the water for Apple and a lot of other companies. Meta being the first mover on this created an industry-wide problem.
Mark Gurman
He also thinks Apple is standing too high on its own privacy record to see the backlash coming, and expects the company to push through with PR briefings, white papers and comparisons — he has already heard Ternus make the argument that recording from glasses is no different from holding up a phone. Patel pointed out that Mark Zuckerberg made the same argument to Alex Heath.
Gurman's own version of the comparison came from someone else.
The Apple Watch has recorded all day for years and nobody objected
Who stopped anyone from recording their whole day with the Voice Memos app on the Apple Watch anyway? This is just a more privacy-centric version of that.
Mark Gurman
Patel's counter-argument is the one Apple has the most trouble with: people who believe their iPhone is listening to them and serving ads on it are describing an Apple problem, not only a Meta one, and Apple cannot acknowledge the link without undoing its own message.
15. Foldables As Default
Asked what he thinks of the iPhone Duo, Gurman gave the most testable claim in the conversation.
Foldables become the normal phone within ten years
I think, and this is a bold take, that foldables will become the new normal within a decade.
Mark Gurman
His analogy is the smartphone itself.
Smartphones went from about 6% of the market to about 85%
If you look at the market share of smartphones at the end of 2006, smartphones had like 6 percent of the market. Now they have 85 percent of the market.
Mark Gurman
Smartphones crossed half the market five to six years in, he said, and the iPhone was not the source of the shift so much as the thing that pulled everyone into the category. He expects the iPhone Duo to do the same job for folding phones, even though Apple is late to them, because of the brand, the fit and finish and the software integration.
The commercial mechanism he named is financing. He expects the Apple Upgrade leasing program to expand internationally, and Apple to stop advertising sticker prices in favor of monthly ones, which locks buyers in. A family of iPhone Duos follows.
The slab phone becomes the legacy format
Very soon the candy bar style is going to become legacy.
Mark Gurman
Patel added that Apple's handoff feature, which moves a phone number between devices, points at people owning two — a folding phone for work and something small for the weekend.
Bonus Insights
What Ternus has to find
Gurman's answer on Ternus's biggest challenge and biggest opportunity was that they are the same thing. "Ternus' Apple for the next three to five years is still Tim Cook's Apple, right?" — the pipeline comes from Cook's era and Cook remains in the building. Within five years, Apple has to decide what replaces the iPhone. The sequence Gurman traced is the Mac at the center, then iCloud, then AI, and the question is what follows both the phone and this generation of AI. He said Ternus has a few years before he has to start, because the thing in question takes five to 10 years to build, and that his tenure will be judged a success if he finds it.
Cook never got his own centerpiece
Both of the products Cook tried to make his own failed. The Vision Pro is the visible one. The other is the car, which Gurman rates as the larger loss: "the car — the car, that was Apple's multi-trillion-dollar market cap opportunity, and they just blew it."
The television promise nobody could keep
Patel added a third item to the list: Jobs said on his deathbed that he had figured out TV, the line ran on the last page of the Isaacson biography, and Cook spent years having to act as though the problem was solved. Gurman's data point on where that went is that Apple has not shipped a new Apple TV box in four years.
Siri AI was the gate on everything
Gurman's explanation for why the device roadmap is arriving all at once is that it was blocked behind one component. "Siri AI has been the gate to all of these new product categories." The AirPods, the Apple TV, the HomePod and the smart home hub were all supposed to have shipped already, and none of them could until Siri AI worked. It now does, in his account, which is why the next 18 months look crowded.
Cook's actual job now
Patel's description of the executive chairman role is that Cook's compensation program is tied to managing the relationships with Xi Jinping and Donald Trump, in the way Eric Schmidt handled governments at Google after Larry Page became chief executive, and Brad Smith does at Microsoft as president. Gurman's response was a joke with a number in it: "For $47 million a year, I would talk to Trump and Xi Jinping on the phone every day."
Gurman's bottom line is that Apple has bought itself an orderly succession and a crowded product roadmap while leaving its central problem untouched: it has no frontier model of its own, no visible plan to build one, and is waiting on other companies' results before deciding whether to try again.
Products, Companies & Tools Mentioned
Apple (The subject throughout: the Ternus handover, the September event, the AI position and the roadmap)
OpenAI (Building a screenless, hockey-puck-sized AI computer with Jony Ive; Apple has asked the court for access to it)
Google (Supplies the models behind Siri AI after Apple's own build "ran into a wall"; Gurman says Apple treats it as a stopgap)
Anthropic (Named as a model partner Apple could use to copy an OpenAI device, because it has no hardware business to protect)
Meta (Launched Muse the same week as Apple's event; Gurman says its glasses "soiled the water" on camera-wearing for everyone else)
Amazon (The Echo Show is Gurman's reference point for Apple's coming smart home hub)
Intel and Qualcomm (The modem businesses Srouji displaced; Apple bought Intel's modem unit and its own modems now ship)
Nvidia (Named as the kind of company Cook did not want Srouji walking to)
Microsoft (Brad Smith as the president-handles-government parallel; HoloLens as Patel's decade-old augmented-reality reference)
Bloomberg (Where Gurman reports; his reporting on Schiller, Srouji and the succession is the source of most of the episode)
iRobot (The Roomba's wireframe map is Gurman's analogy for what camera-equipped AirPods will actually see)
Flock Safety (Patel's example of public hostility to ambient cameras, which he ties to Apple's coming products)
Samsung (Already has half its phone line in foldables, in Gurman's account of where the market goes)
Whole Foods and Walgreens (The two errands Gurman used to describe what camera AirPods would do)
Books & Resources Mentioned
Steve Jobs – Walter Isaacson (Patel's point that a Jobs quote about television on the last page set Apple up for years of expectations it never met)
Listen to the full episode
🔴 YouTube | 🔗 Episode page
Watch the full episode:
If this was worth your time, send it to someone who follows the name.
Get the latest market chatter as it happens: