Lesson 3: The Competitive Landscape of Generative AI
Generative AI models’ commoditization, user engagement, and AI companies’ strategies.
Lesson 3 breaks down the commoditization of AI models, the lack of competitive advantages between AI companies, low user engagement, and the strategies companies are using to develop long-term, durable advantages and moats.
Find all the lessons in the Economics of AI here and the previous lesson below.
Lesson 2: From Chips to Power Grids. The Hidden Bottlenecks Behind the AI Gold Rush
Lesson 2 of The Economics of AI covers the capital investments companies are making to build out AI infrastructure, how they compare with other mature industries, and the bottlenecks that prevent us from realizing the full potential and benefits of Generative AI innovations.
The Golden Age’s mission is to build a more peaceful and prosperous world by popularizing and applying first-principles thinking to the problems around us. Join our community of first-principles thinkers, builders, and investors.
The Competitive Landscape: Commoditization, Engagement, and Strategy
Despite the massive capital expenditures and rapid engineering progress, the competitive landscape for generative AI remains highly uncertain. Three years into the current wave, no clear, durable moats or dominant long-term business models have emerged. The market is characterized by a race toward technological parity, a significant gap between user awareness and deep engagement, and divergent strategies among the key players.
Model Performance: A Race to Parity
While AI models continue to improve at a remarkable pace, they are also converging in capability. For most general-purpose tasks, the leading models are effectively becoming commodities. Data from common benchmarks shows that the top models are within 5-10% of each other in terms of performance, and the leadership position changes almost weekly as new models are released, indicating that a sustained technical advantage is extremely difficult to maintain.
The Engagement Gap: Usage vs. Awareness
The market remains in an early, exploratory phase, defined by broad but shallow engagement.
There is a stark contrast between the high public awareness of AI tools and their actual integration into daily life and work. ChatGPT is a prime example. While ChatGPT boasts an impressive 800 million weekly active users, the data shows that “most people who are using it don’t use it very much.”
Typical usage frequency is once a week or even once a month, indicating a pattern of occasional experimentation rather than deep, daily reliance for most users. Multiple consumer surveys confirm this “engagement gap,” confirming the market remains in an early, exploratory phase, defined by broad but shallow engagement.
Strategic Postures of Key Players
Will long-term value be captured “down the stack” through superior capital, scale, and infrastructure, or “up the stack” through superior product, distribution, and traditional software business models?
In response to this fluid environment, the central players are pursuing distinct and aggressive strategies to secure a long-term advantage.
